Door, Ass, Bang
From the Atlantic Monthly’s rather prescient article on Karl Rove (subscription required):
Rove has always cast himself not merely as a campaign manager but as someone with a mind for policy and for history
Cheney and Iran
From Froomkin’s White House Watch yesterday, I found these tidbits. To me, it sounds like Cheney is quite mad.
From The Washington Note, last May:
Multiple sources have reported that a senior aide on Vice President Cheney’s national security team has been meeting with policy hands of the American Enterprise Institute, one other think tank, and more than one national security consulting house and explicitly stating that Vice President Cheney does not support President Bush’s tack towards Condoleezza Rice’s diplomatic efforts and fears that the President is taking diplomacy with Iran too seriously.
This White House official has stated to several Washington insiders that Cheney is planning to deploy an “end run strategy” around the President if he and his team lose the policy argument.
The thinking on Cheney’s team is to collude with Israel, nudging Israel at some key moment in the ongoing standoff between Iran’s nuclear activities and international frustration over this to mount a small-scale conventional strike against Natanz using cruise missiles (i.e., not ballistic missiles)….
The zinger of this information is the admission by this Cheney aide that Cheney himself is frustrated with President Bush and believes, much like Richard Perle, that Bush is making a disastrous mistake by aligning himself with the policy course that Condoleezza Rice, Bob Gates, Michael Hayden and McConnell have sculpted.
According to this official, Cheney believes that Bush can not be counted on to make the “right decision” when it comes to dealing with Iran and thus Cheney believes that he must tie the President’s hands.
Then, on June 1, the New York Times points to that report, and says:
In interviews, people who have spoken with Mr. Cheney
The best question of the night
Biden
Watching the debate tonight, I have to say to Joe Biden that the very definition of insensitive is pushing a mining widow to one side in order to argue with another candidate about Pakistan.
That’s stupid shit, and just plain mean.
Yearly KOS
I can’t be in Chicago this week, so I’m joining up with the Virtual YearlyKos convention being held in Second Life. I’ve been documenting my experiences there, and I’ll have some posts and pictures when it’s over.
If you can’t join us there, I hear C-SPAN will be showing some of the sessions, and you can also follow along with some stuff via the UStream.tv feed. Here’s a small embed of that:
Please!
An Open Letter to CNN:
Could we stop talking about Hillary Clinton’s
breastscleavage? PLEASE?? This isn’t news.Thank you,
jnfr
LOLCats for Oscar
You have heard the story of Oscar, right? A LOLCat photo was inevitable. Here’s one:
And this is from my friend jef:

More from the Founding Fathers
Does any of this sound familiar?
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good….
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers….
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power….
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:…
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever….
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
We don’t need or want another King.
The Founding Fathers
|
John Sherffius
Jul 23, 2007 |
What would they think about this administration? John Sherffius has an idea.

